Tuesday, January 23, 2018

A520.3.3.RB_CliffordMarc

Image credit: Chron.com
Pablo Picasso said that “every act of creation is, first of all, an act of destruction”. Consider this statement in light of constraints we place on ourselves in the workplace. What are some constraints that you need to destroy before you can engage in creative problem solving? Give an example of how a constraint you placed on yourself prevented you from solving a problem. Reflect on what you could have done differently and how you will prevent that constraint from limiting you in the future.

Constraint.  The word itself feels uncomfortable.  It evokes the thought of straightjackets, fetters, ropes, and chains.  Nobody in their right mind would put any of those on them self.  However, although we may not be inclined to put ourselves in physical constraints, everybody to some extend experiences constraints in the workplace.  Constraints are the factors that limit or restrict what a person can do (Spacey, 2016).  Constraints come in many forms: it could be a false deadline that we place on our self, it could be the feeling that management is not interested in hearing our ideas, or it could be the fear of failure which causes inaction.  

There have been numerous times that I have felt constrained because of my noninquisitiveness.  Whetton and Cameron (2016) say that noninquisitiveness occurs when “the inability to solve problems result from an unwillingness to ask questions, obtain information, or search for data.”  They also suggest that one reason for this is that “Individuals may think they will appear naive or ignorant if they question something” (Whetton & Cameron, 2016).  

I can remember experiencing this conceptual block on several occasions.  It has most frequently occured in a group setting; a training class, a group project, or a town hall type meeting.  In these settings a question has frequently come into my mind that I do not know the answer to.  It might be a question about a particular aircraft system during a training class, or it might be a question about a policy that seems unclear during a town hall meeting.  I rarely ask those questions in those settings because I don’t want to appear ignorant.  I have always valued intelligence and I take pride in the fact that I can solve problems and figure things out on my own.  However, as Whetton and Cameron (2016) suggest, I erroneously have thought that intelligence means knowing all the answers; it has never occurred to me it might have more to do with asking good questions.  If I had been able to overcome my pride and ask the questions, I would not have had to research the answers on my own.  I may also have been able to benefit from the combined creativity of the group instead of relying on my own problem-solving ability.

To prevent this from occurring in the future I need to remember that there are ways to ask a question without seeming unintelligent.  I have heard people frame their questions by saying something like “Pardon my ignorance but…” and then they ask the question.  This approach seems to disarm people and make even out of place questions more acceptable.  It is almost as though the questioner is saying “Sorry guys, I know I should have the answer to this but…”  I guess the old adage, “there is no such thing as a stupid question…” really applies to me in this situation.

Pablo Picasso said that “every act of creation is, first of all, an act of destruction.”  As I overcome my pride and recognize that even intelligent people ask good questions I will be able destroy this constraint of noninquisitiveness and slip out of the straightjacket, break free of the ropes, and break the chains that prevent me from being a better problem-solver.

References

Spacey, J. (2016, January 30). 19 types of project constraints. Retrieved from https://simplicable.com/new/project-constraint

Whetton, D. A. & Cameron, K. S. (2016). Developing management skills 9th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson.

No comments:

Post a Comment